|
by Dharkam
Disclaimer: Discussion of pharmaceutical agents below is presented for
information only. Nothing here is meant to take the place of advice
from a licensed health care practitioner. Consult a physician before
taking any medication.
Let me begin by saying that I do not have the answers to
many of the questions that you, readers, are asking me. I will try
my best to address all of them even if I do not have the exact
answer, by using common sense.
The how-to of PGF2
Q: How long should you use PGF2, do you cycle it or is
there no need to come off it?
A: Bodybuilders are so used to steroid cycling that it is
legitimate to wonder about the necessity of cycling PGF2. After more
than 50 years of both continuous usage and scientific research, no
one has been able to come up with a universal steroid cycling
pattern that could suit everyone. Do not expect that after such a
limited experience with PGF2, anyone could come up with an optimal
cycling pattern. So let's look at a rational way of cycling. If you
are off steroids for 2 months at a time, your PGF2 cycle should last
2 months in order to turn this potential wasting period into an
opportunity to pack on lean muscle.
Another way of looking at PGF2 cycling is to use it for as long
as you can stand it. PGF2 usage is not as comfortable as steroid
use. Most bodybuilders are not motivated enough to inject several
times a day for more than 60-90 days at a time. So, here is your
cycle length. It is counterproductive for bodybuilders to use drugs
reluctantly.
As far as the need to come off is concerned, there is as much
need to come off prostaglandins as need to come off steroids.
Although everyone should discontinue anabolics from time to time,
most pros never do. If you use PGF2 just to look good on the beach,
yes, you should come off. If you have to make a living from body,
you may not have much choice.
Q: How long does it take to see the first results?
A: Cosmetically speaking, less than a week. Most of the early
gains are due to the diuretic properties of prostaglandins. Then you
realize that your muscles get very hard even when relaxed. To get a
similar hardening effect, you would have needed quite a bit of
steroids. You will also remark quickly that the overall shape of
your muscles is much more pleasing. To understand what I mean, take
a picture of yourself and compare it to the picture of a pro. You
will notice that the pro's muscles are fuller and rounder. Again,
you could duplicate this with long and heavy cycles of steroids.
PGF2 simply speeds up this process. In one or two weeks of PGF2, you
can achieve what could have taken one to two years of continuous
steroids to obtain as far as muscle roundness is concerned.
Q: What sort of gains can I expect from the use of PGF2, and
how much fat can I lose e.g. average man 200 pounds, bodybuilder,
with a normal fat layer?
A: Please understand that PGF2 is not a weight gainer. The
first use of steroids is usually associated with a tremendous weight
gain. Most of it is due to water retention and often fat gains too.
You can see this because steroids tend to blow up your face. Most
bodybuilders' faces, offseason, look like a fish tank. They are
usually very pleased with such impressive gains, but as they try to
get rid of the water and the fat to regain a leaner appearance they
realize that the net pure muscle gains while on steroids are more
modest. This is why you cannot transform yourself into a new Yates
with only a few cycles under your belt even if you gain 30 pounds
each time.
With PGF2, you may gain 5 pounds of bodyweight. This certainly
does not sound like a lot. But you have to add the two or three
pounds of extra water you got rid of plus the fat you are shedding.
In terms of pure bodyweight gain, this is not very impressive. On
the other hand, packing on lean muscles and getting rid of the fat
is a better and faster way to get to the top.
As far as fat loss is concerned, it depends of course of your
diet and the other drugs you are using (i.e: insulin). It is hard to
make any estimate as it is impossible to differentiate the water and
the fat losses. Let's say that you can get rid of in between 5 to 10
pounds of water and fat in a matter of 8 - 10 weeks with a moderate
cycle.
Q: For how long has PGF2 has been used? How was it
discovered?
A: As far as I know, bodybuilders have been using
prostaglandins on a regular basis for more than 5 years. Perhaps it
was used before that, but I'm not aware of it. Its use has not been
reported in the bodybuilding magazines. In fact, I am sure you will
keep reading articles claiming prostaglandins are very bad.
About its discovery, I would say that it comes from farmers who
have used this substance to grow their animals in a way that was
undetectable at any drug test used by various governmental agencies.
It may have leaked out from there. If it makes a steer more muscular
why not a bodybuilder? But this was the easiest part -- when it was
first speculated that PGF2 could be a muscle builder, no one knew
whether it would work. There are many potential anabolic substances
out there. Very few really work in the real world. Whenever a new
substance is tried, the odds are very against it in that its chances
of truly working are remote. If it does not work, is it because not
enough was used, is it because it was used the wrong way or simply
as it does nothing at all? The next issue is how much should be
used? What are the side effects? Most of the steroid users may have
been a bit scared about their first time even though millions of
people have used them before. Imagine what it could be with an
obscure veterinary substance that almost no one you are aware of has
ever used! Fortunately, PGF2 has already been employed in women so
the side effects were more or less known. A very few women did die,
but it was not directly because of prostaglandins (not even PGF2)
but a concomitant administration with RU 486 for abortion.
Even though the administration modes in women are very strange,
PGF2 administration did not result in sudden death. Next, the type
of administration had to be decided. All this is not easy, so the
science of PGF2 usage is not very advanced. Ten years from now,
bodybuilders will probably laugh at the way PGF2 is presently used.
Q: Is there a pro using prostaglandins? If PGF2 is not able to
build up a pro rapidly, isn't that a proof of its ineffectiveness?
A: I do not know if any pro is using PGF2 though I would not
be surprised if it were so. The early use of PGF2 had to be done on
drug free bodybuilders which meant beginners. If someone is already
using a tremendous amount of various drugs, how can you tell PGF2 is
actually working? You may feel that it is bringing an extra edge but
you are not sure, nor do you know how much is due to PGF2 or the
synergy between steroids and the prostaglandins. In order to really
discover what PGF2 would do, only one variable (one drug) had to be
used at a time. A beginner with six months to a year of consistent
drug free training under his belt has no reason to experience any
sudden and dramatic change on his body.
A speed-up of the muscle building process was the testimony that
the prostaglandins were working. Only then, steroid users could
experiment with PGF2. First it was used, while off cycle without
steroids. This is again certainly not a good way to become a pro
fast. But one had to figure out whether PGF2 anabolic actions were
strong enough not only to prevent the muscle wasting but rather to
continue to gain lean mass while off steroids. Then only, the
steroid plus prostaglandin stack could be studied. The amounts of
both drugs were varied to see what would happen. To sum up, the
discovery of a new drug has nothing to do with building up a pro
physique. Once a minimal amount of research is done, only then can
pros benefit optimally from it.
What about PGE2?
Q: Isn't PGE2 catabolic? You seem to think otherwise.
Whenever prostaglandins are mentioned, it is usually PGE2 rather
than PGF2 that is discussed. The consensus is that PGE2 is bad. The
main reason for this is because the early major prostaglandin study
performed on muscles did suggest PGE2 was catabolic. In fact, this
is what you would probably conclude after a 5 minute search on
Medline. In a lesser known study, the very same scientific team
admitted that they kind of messed up during their first study. It is
very rare to see this study mentioned, including in scientific
papers. Later, another team of scientists did indeed prove that they
were in error. As most of the information in the bodybuilding world
is based on hearsay and repetition, it suffices that one writer
suggests PGE2 is bad, for another to repeat. You then have two
different writers making the same claim, therefore the readers
considered it as gospel. What I've not figured out yet is why only
the wrong assumptions get repeated in the muscle magazines while the
right information is generally omitted.
To answer your question in a more direct way: I do not consider
that PGE2 is catabolic. Newer research shows that it accelerates the
muscle protein turnover just like androgens. Understand that it
increases both catabolism and anabolism at the same time except that
it accelerates synthesis rate more than degradation. An overall gain
results.
Drug testing
Q: Will PGF2 show up at drug test?
A: So far, PGF2 is not tested for. I doubt that it will ever
be tested. It is a pure muscle builder, not a performance enhancer.
In fact, it tends to reduce strength and performance. Furthermore,
it may be very hard to test as we naturally produce some and it
might be tough to differentiate between natural and exogenous
prostaglandins. On the other hand, PGF2 does alter steroid hormones
in many ways. For example, it might alter the
testosterone/epitestosterone ratio.
Side effects
Q: After some of my own research on PGF2 I have found a
few ways of overcoming a few of the side effects. As you said in
your paper, the side effects were bronchoconstriction and violent
spasms of the intestines and bowel. Could you take salbutamol
(Ventolin Inhaler for asthmatics) for relief of the tightening of
the chest? And could you also take an anti-spasmodic drug such as
Mebeverine Hydrochloride, which is used in irritable bowel syndrome
complaints, to relief the spasms of the bowels and intestines?
A: Beta agonists can help reduce the bronchoconstriction
(which does not occur in all users) but it is not an ideal solution.
First, because it does not completely prevent it. Second, it will
increase the tightening of the muscles. This is going to truly
impress your fellow bodybuilders as they touch your "relaxed"
muscles but it makes it very hard to train.
As far as the intestines are concerned, this is disturbing at
first, then you realize there is a rapid reduction of the impact of
PGF2 so that it is not so disturbing. You also get used to it. It
may be wiser not to mess around with additional drugs.
Q: Are there any drugs or supplements that will prolong
the half life of PGF2 in the body?
A: Sure there are. I just do not know which ones.
Aspirin and prostaglandins
Q: I have read that aspirin can effect prostaglandins in the
body, is this true or does it not apply to PGF2, and should I avoid
any other substance which can effect PGF2?
A: It is true that aspirin is a prostaglandin inhibitor. At
normal dosage, it only weakly affects the muscle prostaglandins. But
whenever you use aspirin, your muscle insulin sensitivity is reduced
because of a lesser secretion of muscle prostaglandins. Several
people did report a significant muscle growth after discontinuing
aspirin. Prostaglandins will also affect your adipose tissue both
directly and indirectly. Because of the aspirin-induced insulin
resistance, your insulin secretion will increase in order to make up
for the weaker effects in muscles, resulting in an excess of insulin
effect within the adipose tissue. Insulin promotes fat aggregation
if unopposed. Therefore, I do not recommend continual use of aspirin
for bodybuilders unless you want to get smaller and fatter. Of
course, the dose also matters. A little bit of aspirin may not hurt
much while high doses will.
Paradoxically, for someone who has no adipose tissue problem, it
may be interesting to "play" with aspirin. As I said, a muscle gain
usually results from aspirin discontinuance. Chances are it is
because muscles try to overcome the inhibitory action of aspirin on
prostaglandin secretion. Once you stop aspirin, there is a rebound
in the muscle production of prostaglandins (i.e: there is an excess
of prostaglandins) leading to muscle growth. It may be possible to
do small but repeated cycles of aspirin in order to boost growth
this way. This is a worthwhile way to pursue. For those who desires
to try this more "natural" approach, do not forget to use small
doses oral PGE1 in order to minimize the side effects of aspirin on
the gastrointestinal tract plus high doses of a prostaglandin
precursor such as primrose oil.
DNP and prostaglandins
The following is not a question but rather a remark that I would
like to address in a prostaglandin way:
"I feel that DNP, in doses of 2mg/kg can be an effective anabolic
agent. I just can't tell all the mechanisms why it works so well."
Whenever one studies prostaglandins, one hears about DNP a lot.
DNP causes cellular damages which results in prostaglandin leaks.
PGE2 release in particular is severely increased as a result of the
addition of DNP. At first, scientists speculated that it was because
of the PGE2 elevation that cell damages appeared (the catabolic
theory of PGE2). The mere addition of aspirin proved this theory
wrong. Whenever aspirin is administered along with DNP, PGE2 release
was inhibited yet, cellular damage remained. Therefore, PGE2 release
is the consequence and not the cause of the cellular damage. All
this to say that DNP will cause muscle damage a bit like training
does. But unlike a workout-induced damage, it is not localized to a
single muscle group but is rather spread all over. Of course, the
body will try to stop or minimize the wasting process that DNP is
trying to trigger. Your body will try to calm down the main
catabolic pathways DNP puts into play. Once DNP is discontinued, the
rate of protein degradation in the muscle will be restricted a a
bare minimum while the long-lasting prostaglandin leaks will keep on
going. The end result is that the rate of synthesis is boosted while
the catabolic pathways are slowed. We are then placed in the most
favorable situation possible to build muscles fast.
Q: Can I stack DNP with PGF2 for better thermogenic
response?
A: I would say no as I speculate that DNP thermogenic actions
require the release of prostaglandins or at least employ similar
pathways. To determine this for sure, scientists (do not try this at
home) could use very high doses of aspirin a bit before DNP to
determine whether the thermogenic response is affected. The same
kind of result should be realized with Dantrolene as an inhibitor.
Q: Where is it possible to obtain PFG2? Is it illegal
as AS are?
A; Try your best guess on this one!
Q: Does it come in only veterinary form?
A: No, but it is the cheapest and easiest form to get.
Q: What dosage (in cc's) should I use at each
injection?
A: All the info I could give you were provided in the part
III of the prostaglandin article series. You are on your own for the
rest. Of course, I could pretend to know all this. The truth is I do
not know how much YOU should use. I do not even know if you should
use PGF2 in the first place.
Q: I have never used steroids, is this a prerequisite? It just
seems that PFG2 is more in line with my goals of losing bodyfat
while developing muscle. I was about to cycle some T enanthate, as
my first time, should I do that first?
A: No, you do not have to have several cycles of steroids
under your belt to get the most out of PGF2. Although -- you may
want to use testosterone first because it is easier. This way you
could first get used to the needle manipulations plus all the little
things that are part of the education of a bodybuilder.
Ripped off
Q: Thank you so much for your time and knowledge. I
also enjoyed your article about prohormone stacking which appeared
in the [name of company elided] buyers guide.
A: Thanks, but the trouble is I've never seen this prohormone
stack nor did I ever write for them, nor do I recommend any of their
products. This is funny as I am not the only one complaining about
it. They seem used to this kind of misleading marketing ploy.
Did I make mistakes?
Q: This may be a memory lapse :-), but I thought that
Dantrolene was used in some hyperthermia crisis conditions. Someone
suggested that it was stacked with Lutalyse, which itself could
elevate T. Wouldn't that be contradictory? Or was it the actual
intention?
A: True, it is a contradiction to use both a thermogenic with
an anti-thermogenic drug if your main goal is to get leaner. My
article was entitled "grow off steroids" which was mainly concerned
with muscle growth and not as much with fat loss.
Q: Dharkam, Excellent article on PGF2, but where in this world
can we find it? I know it's for animal use so I checked two local
animal stores, neither of them even heard of it. It sure is a bitch
when you read about the new cutting edge shit, but then can't find
it til about a year down the road.
A: You may want to go to a store selling bigger animals and
not pets. If all the drugs were both freely available and cheaper,
bodybuilders would be far bigger. You may feel better by knowing
your problem is a problem everyone faces.
From a single unsatisfied reader.
Q: In his article "Grow Even When Off Steroids: Part 2"
Dharkam makes a couple of incorrect predictions. Dantrolene taken
before a workout will certainly reduce exercise performance
effectively cancelling any benefits accrued from its ability as a
calcium channel blocker.
A: I sure made more than a couple of mistakes if you do not
understand what you read. Here is what I said: "What you want is for
Dantrolene to produce its magic right AFTER but NOT during the
workout. If your training lasts less than one hour, you can take
Dantrolene before your workout. This way, the drug will kick in at
the right time." The misunderstanding may come from the fact that
you assume oral Dantrolene works as soon as you have swallowed it.
As with most of the oral drugs, it takes a while before the molecule
starts working.
Q: You recommend amrinone as a Ubiquitin-Protease inhibitor.
The anabolic effects of amrinone are due to its effects as a PDE3
inhibitor and the corresponding release of insulin. Dharkam suggests
the use of insulin in conjunction with PDE3 inhibitors, but fails to
mention what a potentially lethal combination this is. All PDE3
inhibitors cause an increase in insulin tolerance, a release of
insulin, and an increase in plasma glucose. If the PDE3 is
eliminated while insulin concentrations are excessively high a
hypoglycemic coma may result.
[Editor's note: PDE3 = Phosphodiesterase 3]
A: You are discounting the lipolytic properties of Amrinone.
Amrinone + insulin is safer than insulin alone. Insulin will deprive
the blood of glucose while Amrinone will increase the release of
fats (plus glycerol) which will serve as energy replacement leaving
what is left of glucose for the brain. Insulin is certainly not safe
if you do not know what you are doing -- this is why I recommended
oral insulin boosters first, rather than straight insulin. Amrinone
was not my first pick either as an anti-catabolic. Alone it is best
while on a diet but this was not what the article was mainly dealing
with. By the way, if you want everything to be safe do not use drugs
and do not get involved in bodybuilding.
|